Wednesday, December 15, 2010

The Pitch at Wyman-Gordon Field, Take II

Proposed Wyman-Gordon Field with Proposed Airline BRT (Red) and Trolley (Green) Public Transportation Stops
I discussed building a soccer specific stadium for the New England Revolution in a previous post, it is by far the most viewed of my recent posts. In the comments, Harry T. points out that I'm not the first/only one with this thought: See this post from late 2006 by Harry Tembenis (Harry T. I presume?) on Bill Randall's blog about Harry's idea of building a stadium on the Wyman-Gordon site for a Canadian Football League team. Also see this post from this summer on Paulie's blog about the Worcester World Cup event and David Z.'s comment "every time I drive by the former Wyman Gordon’s wasteland at Kelly Square, I think it would be a perfect location for a soccer only stadium for the New England Revolution."

I think the CFL expansion team is a great idea. Based on what Harry said in the 2006 post, the 20-25,000 seating capacity needed for the Revolution appears to work for a CFL team. I had suggested Holy Cross football could move it's games to Wyman-Gordon Field (the seating capacity also would appear to be the right size for this use too), but a Worcester based CFL team would be another great option instead of (or perhaps in addition to?) Holy Cross football. With Pats tickets almost impossible to get/too expensive for most, there may indeed be enough demand throughout New England to support a CFL team in Worcester. In the 2006 post Harry talked about the CFL possibly expanding with a few US franchises, I checked out the CFL website are there are still no US teams, does anyone know if the CFL still has plans to expand into the US?

The current lack of infrastructure in general and public transportation in particular was mentioned on Paulie's blog as a reason why the Revolution would not be interested in Worc. I would agree that there is not enough public transportation infrastructure in place today, but between the underway doubling of MBTA service between Worcester and Boston, the development of a bus rapid transit system connecting ORH and Union Station (with a Wyman-Gordon Field stop) and a tourist targeted trolley loop that would take visitors from Gateway Park to Union Station then through the Canal District and deliver them to the front door of Wyman-Gordon Field, I think we have the makings of a pretty good public transit infrastructure to support the stadium.

Of course, many will come by car, which leads to images of a gridlocked Kelley Square. Like any stadium in an urban area, traffic and parking plans will need to be studied closely. Parking in the Green Island residential neighborhoods should be limited to residents only during events. Event based street closings and select one-ways in Green Island might also be considered to keep non-residents out of this residential area. Looking at the image above, I think it's important to note that the stadium is located in an area I call the Junction District and not in Kelley Square itself. Those coming from Boston, SE MA and Providence will likely arrive at the stadium via 146 and Quinsigamond Ave, thus avoiding Kelley Square; those coming from Hartford, Springfield and points west will likely be entering via 290 E (though the 146 exit is a viable option from this direction in this case, old habits die hard - I speak from personal experience!) and could be directed to use Southbridge St., thus avoiding Kelley Square and those coming from Maine, NH and northeast and northcentral MA will be coming into the city by 290 W - these users would be the ones most likely to use the Kelley Square exit - but I would think that signage could encourage users to exit at either Lincoln St. or MLK Blvd. and either 1) park at Gateway Park (Lincoln St. exit) or City Square or Union Station (MLK Blvd. exit) and ride the trolley or Airline to the stadium, or 2) drive down the Major Taylor to Foster (the recent pedestrianization of Foster St. being a nice change to the car dominated design of most of Worcester's streets (Worcester slogan suggestion #215: "Worcester, a City that walks!")) to McGrath stretch and enter the stadium from the west, thus avoiding Kelley Square.

11 comments:

  1. Eric: Believe it or not, Mike Vrabel ...when he was with the New England Patriots was considering possibly investing in a CFL Franchise for New England for when he retired. As he was traded to Kansas City ...I'm not sure if that is still in his plans. I wrote that piece back in 2006 to try and have Vrabel lure Flutie as an investor/face to give the idea a better selling point...

    Great blog and great ideas, BTW...

    Harry T(embenis)
    Worcester,MA

    ReplyDelete
  2. Worcester, a city that bikes, too ...

    http://pauliespointofview.blogspot.com/2010/11/nuevo-bike-racks-installed-today-in.html

    Harry T
    Worcester,MA

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eric: With all the recent CSX talks recently, don't forget that Worcester will be the ONLY destination in all of New England to have commuter rail service to both North Station and South Station in Boston once this project is completed... this opens up the possibility of bringing in soccer fans from the North and South shore into Worcester for Revolution games...


    Harry T
    Worcester,MA

    ReplyDelete
  4. Come to the Crompton Park Master Plan meeting on Thursday January 20th at 6:30 pm at the Green Island Neighborhood Center (the little building in the park) to discuss your awesome idea with the city's Parks Department and the community!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Eric,

    Great ideas and I am encouraged that people (including Rick Rushton) are finding your blog. Did you also know that the new owner of the Worcester Tornadoes envisions building a baseball complex with multiple practice fields and facilities. I will try searching for the article and post a link. The WG property would also be a great place for soemthing like that. The possibilities are endless.

    DavidZ

    ReplyDelete
  6. I found the link to the article about the new owner of the Worcester Tornadoes exploring the possibility of building a youth development complex.

    Here is an exerpt from the article in Worcester Magazine;

    "Additionally, Breighner and some other former Ripken Baseball execs, are eyeing Worcester as a site for building a 20-to-30-acre, multiple field, youth-development complex.

    “The key word is ‘exploring,’” he cautions, but also mentions Worcester would be a “natural area” as it’s within an eight-hour drive for 20 million people."

    Here is the link to the full story -

    http://www.worcestermag.com/city-desk/top-news/Moneyball-101512484.html

    DavidZ

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dave:

    Was this the article?

    http://www.worcestermag.com/home/top-stories/Moneyball-101512484.html?m=y&smobile=y&c=y

    Harry T
    Worcester,MA

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes it was Harry. I added a follow-up to my post with the link last night but apparently it is lost somewhere in cyberspace. LOL

    DavidZ

    ReplyDelete
  9. In previous posts you make a compelling argument for why the New England Revolution should seriously consider Worcester for their new home. Having started your posts with ideas for a new rapid transit model in the City (some darn good ones there, too) you set the stage for a magical redevelopment tour of the city, and I think you’re on the right track (no pun intended). No matter what redevelopment area in the city you’re looking at a well planned and integrated transportation plan will be essential. More rapid transit also means more pedestrians (see slogan suggestion #215). In a way it doesn’t matter if it’s the Revolution or a CFL team, the transportation issue must be addressed.

    You’re litany of reasons for bringing in the Revolution I think are all right on the mark, and I’d like to add a couple more. The obvious one (and a reiteration of one you already mentioned) is they’re actively seeking a new home in the Commonwealth, and I would be very surprised if the Krafts did not have some existing ties to the Worcester community. The other reason is that soccer seems a near perfect fit for Worcester; it is extremely popular among the youth, in the outlying schools and the many ethic communities. It is actively played in the city by both youth and adults (http://www.gwasa.com/), and a professional team could provide a positive way of connecting these growing communities to each other and the region. Worcester is an extremely diverse city, and it always will be, and we have to embrace both the established and burgeoning communities to remain healthy. Also, if we still desire to be recognized either internationally or simply as a regional destination, I don’t see how you could do better than soccer. Here’s Jeremy Shulkin’s article on soccer in Worcester: http://www.worcestermag.com/city-desk/top-news/96491489.html

    You also propose some suggestions for much touted public/private partnership opportunities in the Crompton Park area, and again, I think you’re dead on. Your focus on community building and youth engagement and public services is a perfect fit for both an up-and-coming neighborhood and a professional sports team and has the possibility of strengthening an existing urban core without displacing its communities.

    Finally, Worcester and the revolutionary spirit are not exactly strangers. From Isaiah Thomas to Abbie Hoffman--and many more bright lights in between—this city has helped upset the status quo (more then than now) in many different arenas, including abolition, the women’s rights movement, women’s education, poetry and medicine. I think almost any professional sports team is an asset, but it would be nice to bring a little revolution back to Worcester.

    Good stuff, keep it up.

    Jim McKeag

    ReplyDelete
  10. Man...would Jeff Barnard be proud reading this post!

    Harry T
    Worcester,MA

    ReplyDelete